It has always been a hot issue in any country to give out a clear definition of what kind of activities disturb public security. For one, what should be prioritized: public security or a human's right to privacy?
Wiretapping has been an issue in the limelight not only in the United States but around the world as well. Shall we trade personal privacy for national security or a mere mention of it?
Thinking about making a comment on this blog post? Great! But please remember that this space is for just that, comments about this blog post. It is not a place to post random thoughts about other stuff. We found that most of the "comments" posted here are not comments at all and should have really been posted in our forum. So:
If you are just planning to spam... go away as all the comments are premoderated
Have something to actually say about this blog post, please submit your comment here:
Leave a comment:
We welcome your comments on this post in the Privacy Blog. That means a comment on this post, not something about some other topic.
Name: (required)
Email: (required, not published)
Comment:
Note: Your comment will be immediately submitted and you will have no opportunity to review to edit it.
It is recommend that you register on Privacy Blog and login so you can include full html (ie: links). We don't have a chapta because we think we're smarter than the spambots.
20080316-131347-Public-vs-Private
* com * top 100 * 10 * 3798 * Blog * Espanol *
Have you added a link to us from your website? (3798):
